Judge race enters court
- Share via
Paul Clinton
The race for a county judgeship has turned into a legal battle
with two local candidates feuding over each other’s ballot
statements.
Vicki Ann Bridgman and Kelly Ann MacEachern, both Newport Beach
residents and candidates for Orange County Superior Court judgeship
No. 22, filed the dueling legal challenges last week, court records
show.
A hearing in the case is scheduled for 1:30 p.m. today in Orange
County Superior Court.
MacEachern, in an Aug. 22 complaint, accused Bridgman of making a
series of claims that are “false, misleading or inconsistent” with
the state’s election code.
Three days earlier, Bridgman made a similar legal argument in an
Aug. 19 legal filing. Both candidates filed their candidate
statements on Aug. 8.
When contacted Monday, Bridgman defended her claims and said she
hadn’t seen MacEachern’s request to have a judge “strike the
offending comments” from her statement.
“I can’t comment on what I haven’t seen,” Bridgman said.
“Everything in my statement is honest and truthful.”
In her complaint, MacEachern questioned what she says is
Bridgman’s claim that she has received the “endorsements of various
attorney organizations,” as well as Rep. Chris Cox, who represents
Newport Beach.
In her ballot statement, Bridgman said she has earned the support
of Orange County Sheriff Mike Carona, as well as “leadership in the
Assn. of Orange County Deputy District Attorneys, the Orange County
Attorneys’ Assn., the California Prosecutors’ Assn.” and other
groups.
In written statements, attorneys’ association President
Christopher Kralick, who is also the vice president of the
prosecutors’ group, said the groups have not endorsed either
candidate.
Bridgman also said Cox “described me as superbly qualified.” Cox
sent letters to both candidates congratulating them on their victory
in the March 5 primary. Because neither candidate received more than
50% of the vote, they must face off during a Nov. 5 runoff.
In an Aug. 14 letter to Bridgman, Cox said he sent a similar
letter to MacEachern and used “the same words about the other
candidate seeking this office.”
Cox sent another letter to Bridgman on Aug. 20, after discussing
her ballot statement over the phone.
“I appreciate your willingness to remove the references to me in
your ballot statement, if it is within your power to do so, as we
discussed by phone yesterday,” Cox wrote.
Once the ballot statements are filed and certified with Orange
County Registrar of Voters Rosalyn Lever, they cannot be altered
unless by order of a judge.
“We cannot allow any changes,” Lever said. “It’s up to the judge.”
Among the other claims, MacEachern objects to Bridgman’s statement
that she “won the March primary with 46.6% of the vote.”
Bridgman, a deputy district attorney, also says she has prosecuted
“gang members, drug peddlers, rapists and robbers.” MacEachern
disputes that claim too, alleging that Bridgman has appeared in court
on those cases only to set hearing dates and never led the district
attorney’s case.
Bridgman referred questions about the specific claims to her
attorney, Darryl R. Wold.
“I assume everything she said in her statement is accurate,” Wold
said. “Most of these complaints are highly technical and nitpicky.”
Wold said the claim against MacEachern’s statement was filed three
days earlier as a preemptive move. Scott Zimmon filed the complaint
on behalf of Bridgman.
“We didn’t want to create any publicity for it if MacEachern
didn’t initiate it herself,” Wold said. “We wouldn’t have taken any
action.”
It alleges that MacEachern, a deputy district attorney who lives
in Corona del Mar, falsely claims she was named Outstanding Orange
County Prosecutor.
The lawsuit also claims MacEachern filed “extraneous material” on
the statement that is not permitted, including a long list of
endorsements and praise from the Los Angeles Times.
Neither MacEachern nor her attorney could be reached for comment
on the allegations before press time.
* PAUL CLINTON covers the environment and politics. He may be
reached at (949) 764-4330 or by e-mail at [email protected].
All the latest on Orange County from Orange County.
Get our free TimesOC newsletter.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Daily Pilot.