Letter to the Editor
- Share via
Not only is Phillip B. Greer way off base, he is out of the ballpark
(Letter to the Editor -- “City should have talked to Newport Coast
residents,” Jan. 24). His letter contained several serious errors that
need to be addressed.
Greer stated that the city of Newport Beach should have talked to
Newport Coast residents prior to the annexation proceedings. In fact,
more than 1 1/2 years ago, representatives of the city made it clearly
known to all communities that they would be available to meet and discuss
the annexation with any group requesting further information.
The only community to respond was the Santa Lucia Homeowners Assn.
After the meeting, with information provided by the city and the Newport
Coast Committee of 2000, the majority of the residents were supportive of
the proposed annexation. However, at no time prior to the annexation did
Greer request that city representatives attend his homeowners association
meetings to provide information and answers to questions.
Greer stated that a Daily Pilot article (“Challenge to annexation
tossed aside,” Dec. 5) was written to hide widespread disenchantment that
exists in Newport Coast for the annexation. We would be very surprised if
the Pilot had this agenda in mind when the article was written.
Furthermore, Greer’s statement pertaining to the disenchantment is far
removed from the truth. The vast majority of residents in Newport Coast
and Newport Ridge supported the annexation and the efforts of the
Committee of 2000.
Contrary to another assertion by Greer, during the annexation
negotiation period, residents were kept informed of all matters by the
use of newsletters, general meetings and through information posted on
the Newport Coast Committee of 2000 Web site (o7 www.newportcoast.orgf7
).
After four years of negotiations, the committee was able to secure an
agreement that benefited the community with a financial package
consisting of $25 million and other substantial financial and
service-related benefits.
Greer stated he secured signatures from 1,100 individuals indicating
their dissatisfaction with the annexation process. Again, he misstated
the facts on this matter. County records indicate there were 3,412
registered voters in the Newport Coast and Newport Ridge during the
annexation proceedings. While 853 votes were needed, only 658 valid
signatures came in.
Furthermore, Greer cannot claim responsibility for all 658 votes.
There was a mailer sent to the entire community by another resident that
produced signatures, as well as votes sent directly by individuals
unconnected with Greer’s efforts. These facts negate Greer’s main
contention that people had no opportunity to vote on the annexation
issue. In point of fact, the community did have an opportunity to vote,
and it chose to not oppose the annexation. In the end, and according to
applicable law, there were simply not enough signatures to trigger a vote
on annexation.
Greer also claimed that he “represents” 1,100 residents. However, the
actual number is probably a fraction of what he believes it to be. Many A
Simple Vote petition signatures were duplicates, and many were obtained
from non-Newport Coast and non-Newport Ridge registered voters.
Furthermore, if residents had been told the truth when A Simple Vote
collected signatures, Greer’s constituency would likely shrink even
further. We believe that the petition workers for A Simple Vote
misrepresented the facts in their zeal to collect signatures. They
reportedly told residents that the city would completely disregard the
pre-annexation agreement and take over all the parks, renege on its
promise to pay for tax relief and raise taxes for infrastructure
improvements in other parts of the city.
None of this is true. Many residents said they signed the petition
just to get these folks off the doorstep because their tactics were so
aggressive. Finally, and again contrary to what Greer stated in his
letter, the Aviation Committee for the city has taken the position that
it is opposed to any aircraft flights over the Newport Coast area.
The Newport Coast Committee of 2000 Steering Committee was selected by
board members of the majority of homeowners associations, and Greer
attended several of the committee’s meetings. While Greer’s position on
the annexation was clearly in the minority, and he is obviously a poor
loser, at least he is consistent. He filed a lawsuit against the county
and lost twice trying to get a court order to stop the annexation.
Then he lost trying to have the judge disqualified. Supporting
documents in his lawsuits contain facts about events that never occurred.
We find it curious that in over four years of the Committee of 2000’s
existence, never once did Greer raise the issue of fairness with regard
to the protest period versus a general vote on annexation.
It is our opinion that the true motivation behind all of his recent
behavior is simply self-promotion. We have always believed in the
democratic process, and clearly the will of the majority of the residents
prevailed on the annexation issue. When Greer didn’t get his way, he
criticized the process instead of accepting the will of the majority and
electing to work within the system.
Perhaps Greer should stop reading “Looking Out For No. 1” and instead
consider picking up “How To Win Friends And Influence People.”
At the forthcoming Newport Coast Advisory Committee meetings, all
voices will be heard, and their input will be seriously considered prior
to the formation of recommendations to the Newport Beach City Council.
A public forum is an outstanding opportunity for all positions to be
heard, and we have every reason to believe that this process will in fact
take place.
JIM McGEE
GERRY ROSS
DAN WAMPOLE
AL WILLINGER
Newport Coast
* EDITOR’S NOTE: The letter writers are steering committee members of
the Newport Coast Committee of 2000.
All the latest on Orange County from Orange County.
Get our free TimesOC newsletter.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Daily Pilot.