Global spending on movies increased 2% in 2012, report says
- Share via
2012 was a good year for the movie business, as worldwide spending on films grew 2%, or $1.3 billion, to $62.4 billion, a report released this week said.
The increase comes after a modest uptick of .9% in 2011 and declines in 2008 and 2009, according to research firm IHS. Data from 2010 was not immediately available. Over the next four years, IHS expects growth in movie spending to continue growing 2% to 3%.
Cinemas and the Asia-Pacific region were the two biggest contributors to last year’s growth. Movie spending in China, which is in the midst of a theater-building binge, along with Japan, India and other nearby countries, grew 12% last year to $10 billion.
By 2016, the region should be No. 2 in the world behind North America, IHS predicted. It is currently No. 3 behind Western Europe.
Spending on movie tickets increased by 7% to $33.4 billion as more people visited theaters in every region of the world.
But consumers bought and rented fewer DVDs and Blu-rays, with total spending on discs down 3% to $23.7 billion, continuing a longtime trend.
Purchases and rentals of movies online grew to $4.9 billion (IHS did not disclose the percentage rise). However, the digital realm still remains a relatively small part of the mix, accounting for just 7% of global spending on films.
The positive global news comes after a good year in the domestic market. Box-office receipts in the U.S. and Canada rose a combined 6%, and home entertainment spending edged up 0.23% after falling for the previous seven years.
ALSO:
Home video revenue stops falling
Schwarzenegger’s comeback flops, Del Toro’s ‘Mama’ a hit
More marketers lengthen Super Bowl ads to stand out during game
MORE
INTERACTIVE: TVs highest paid stars
INTERACTIVE: YouTube’s viral videos of 2012
PHOTOS: Hollywood back lot moments
More to Read
From the Oscars to the Emmys.
Get the Envelope newsletter for exclusive awards season coverage, behind-the-scenes stories from the Envelope podcast and columnist Glenn Whipp’s must-read analysis.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.