Divergent Views on Hand-Burning Decision

Re “O.C. Judge Faces Review,” May 8:

The criticism of the manner in which Judge James O. Perez processed the “finger burn” case leads me to defend Perez. The cry to hang the judge is not justified. Perez’s decision, with the probation supervision and the $100 fine, carries a message that is meaningful to a working man.

Perez served the court system in Orange County for 20 years before retirement. Since retirement he has taken assignments to help carry the load of the understaffed courts. He should be applauded, not condemned.

Walter W. Charamza

Newport Beach

*

I am outraged by the $100 fine that was imposed on Wellington Soto for burning his son’s hand as punishment for stealing a package of gum. What can we do to see that Perez never sets foot in a courthouse again?

I am the mother of three grown children, a grandmother to five, a college graduate with degrees in nursing and psychology and am a Realtor. I point these things out to stress that I am exposed to people from all walks of life. I have met many people of different cultures, and I know that none would use this as a form of punishment.

Is Soto of sound mind? This is such irrational thinking. God only knows what the next form of punishment might be. This is child abuse any way you spell it. The father should have been sentenced to jail and this child should be placed in a loving home.

P.S. Where was the mother?

Joyce Phillips

Huntington Beach