Bakery Razing

* For a commission that’s supposed to help preserve what little architectural culture Los Angeles has left to unanimously vote to demolish a unique historical landmark seems preposterous (May 29). The main argument, that the former Van de Kamp’s bakery is “in very bad shape” according to Mary George, Cultural Heritage Commission president, seems equally incredible, judging by the fact that the facade, roof and walls are all intact. She states that northeast L.A. “needs the jobs”--the mantra of the ‘90s. Demolition does not automatically guarantee jobs.

Since the area’s councilman, Mike Hernandez, and the developers are all anxious for demolition without any consideration to some form of preservation, I would like to suggest by way of example that other bakery across town, the Helms Bakery. I’m sure the interests involved in the Van de Kamp’s venture can come up with something creative. I’m equally sure that if the building is razed, what will be built there will be much less eye-catching and less visually attractive. No matter how much money is involved in a new project, landmarks are not made to order. Once they’re gone--they are gone.

RON GROEPER

Los Angeles