Pay Raises
- Share via
Several letters (Nov. 27) disparage the idea that state constitutional officers and legislators should get a pay raise concurrent with the imposition of an austerity program to help balance the state budget. Several writers decried the state keeping the $17-a-month federal cost-of-living increase for the aged, poor and disabled and using this $58-million windfall against the state shortfall.
The pay raise was suggested by a citizen salary commission enacted through a voter-approved initiative a couple of years ago. It’s not a case of elected officials wanting to increase their own salaries. Second, all the pay raises proposed total a mere $1.5 million a year, a fraction of the $58 million pocketed by the state.
The issues are not connected. Fair compensation is a necessity, especially with the passage of Prop. 140. The possibility of a lifetime seat sometimes balanced a low salary. But with the new six-years-and-out law, proper pay is a must.
JERRY HERMES, San Diego
Get the L.A. Times Politics newsletter
Deeply reported insights into legislation, politics and policy from Sacramento, Washington and beyond. In your inbox three times per week.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.
